Legitimizing State Capitalism: External Threat, Nationalism, and Support for State Ownership
PDFLatest version: October 10, 2026
State ownership has outlived the socialist ideology that once justified it. In China, about half or more of citizens have favored expanding state ownership since 1990, despite decades of market-oriented reform and the well-documented inefficiency and corruption of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). I argue that, under intensifying geopolitical rivalry, the Chinese state has extended nationalism into the economy, invoking external threat to present SOEs as guardians of national security. This frame may translate into support for state ownership through two mechanisms: state firms come to stand for “us” against “them” (identity), or state control promises to insure the nation against foreign coercion (insurance). Analyses of high school textbooks and 4.3 million party newspaper articles show that the party-state has increasingly justified state ownership in nationalist terms. A factorial difference-in-differences design around the 2012 Diaoyu/Senkaku dispute shows that support for state ownership was markedly higher where exposure to nationalist mobilization was greater, a gap that opened only after the dispute. A conjoint experiment favors identity over insurance: the premium on state control is largest when SOEs are framed as safeguards against foreign threat, and no larger in chokepoint sectors such as critical minerals and high technology than elsewhere.
